Cheri H.
Underweight packets and quality control
We question the quality of their food based upon their product weight misrepresentation. And, the amount of potatoes and rice seems absorbent to the protein portion. We’ve been paying nearly $250 a month to feed our golden retriever “portions”, meaning we need to subsidize the NomNom food with our own. We noticed from the beginning that many packets appeared underweight and this past month they were so egregious we started weighing them. Many packets were more than 25% underweight. So NomNom claims your dog will obtain a “healthy weight”, sure, because they’re not being fed the calories they claim because their quality control, or by their choice, are not sending you what you’re paying for. We brought it to their attention by sending proof of photos of their food portions, unpackaged and unopened, on the scale, but it was obvious to see how underweight the packets were. We asked how their package date codes work and all we got was silence. This has been going on for months and their fix was to send a few packets as replacements. But, upon weighing some of them after defrost, the same issue remains. If a company can not maintain the weight that they advertise can you really trust their other quality control measures? And we’re not talking about a few grams, we’re talking about gross underweight. We think not. There are a lot of fresh dog food companies out there, and they are expensive. We should at least be getting what we paid for.



