João B.
Eu Fui aprovado em uma avaliação.
Eu Fui aprovado em uma avaliação. Vamos ver na conta financiada. Se correr tudo bem volto para reavaliação

My Funded Perps is a proprietary trading platform focused on perpetual futures markets. Traders participate in structured, single-phase challenges where they trade across hundreds of 24/7 crypto perpetuals, alongside indices, forex, stocks, and commodities, using simulated capital. By meeting specific risk management rules and profit targets, traders can qualify for funded accounts and earn payouts of up to a 90% profit split based on their performance. Backed by the infrastructure of My Funded Futures and Funding Predicts, My Funded Perps aims to create a transparent, skill-based environment with true market conditions that rewards disciplined trading and responsible risk management.
My Funded Perps (myfundedperpetuals.com) has 201 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.8 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing
Investments & Wealth · Wilmington, Delaware
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Dover, Delaware
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Wilmington, Delaware
Excellent

Investments & Wealth · Dover, Delaware
Excellent
Showing 2 reviews with 2 stars · Clear filters
João B.
Eu Fui aprovado em uma avaliação. Vamos ver na conta financiada. Se correr tudo bem volto para reavaliação
Joe W.
MyFundedPerps paid my payout in full and explicitly stated they would not attempt to recover it. However, immediately afterward I was permanently banned for what they classified as “Evaluation Gambling and Repeated Maximum-Risk Attempts.” I purchased 15 evaluations over roughly two days, using an aggressive, but defined strategy. On the $100k evaluations, the max loss is $3,000 and the target is $9,000. I treated each as a 1:3 risk/reward opportunity. I accepted that many evaluations would fail rather than slowly grinding toward the target. MFP specifically cited five consecutive ETH shorts, four of which failed before the fifth passed. These weren't random bets, they were repeated entries on the same short thesis. With volatility increasing, I actually downsized the fifth attempt from a $100k to a $50k evaluation. When this evaluation passed i immediately entered the funded on the same trade thesis with less risk, which ultimately led to a payout. I passed 4 of the 15 evaluations and brought 3 of those 4 funded accounts into payout territory. I gave back roughly $8k and $3k in profits on two because I'd already had a large winning week and chose to let them run. The fourth account ultimately locked in my payout with a trailing stop. I understand MFP prohibiting repeated maximum-risk attempts if that's their rule. My disagreement is with describing the trades as attempts to pass “through chance.” They were based on a consistent market thesis and predefined risk/reward. Credit where it's due, they paid me. But aggressive traders should understand that repeatedly taking full evaluation risk even on a defined setup can result in a permanent ban from MFP, with no opportunity to explain the trades. Side note: if this firm properly ran an A-book execution model on my trades they would be extremely profitable, however it seems they do not.
Response from My Funded PerpsSep 17, 2026
Hi, thank you for the detailed review, and for noting that your payout was paid in full. We want to clarify how this rule works, since it may help other traders. It prohibits "intentionally risking the account's full allowable loss on one or a small number of positions" and "repeatedly using the same high-risk strategy across new evaluations after prior failures." The approach you describe in your review, accepting that many evaluations will fail and buying new ones to repeat the same trade until one passes, is what the rule covers. Our review of the activity showed the repeated all-or-nothing approach the rule is written to address. A smaller account may involve less risk in dollar terms, but the relevant consideration is how much of the account's allowable loss is being risked. A position can still put the full allowable loss at risk regardless of account size. We also don't agree that describing an approach as a defined setup resolves the concern. The issue is whether the approach includes meaningful risk management or relies on repeatedly risking the account's full allowable loss until an attempt passes. We determined the latter was the case, you used the repeated all-or-nothing approach the rule is written to address. Our evaluations are designed to reward consistent risk management, not repeated all-or-nothing attempts. We wish you success in your future trading. – The MyFundedPerps Team