LeansAI is a sports analytics firm that develops advanced AI algorithms that predict the probability certain outcomes in sporting events. Clients receive precise game probabilities and unit weights relative to lines or spreads set by bookmakers, and can decide if they want to incorporate the LeansAI predictions into their own sports betting strategies. The LeansAI proprietary algorithm, Remi, provides a game by game history of past performance for transparency into the historical success rate of the predictions. LeansAI analyzes multiple sports, including MLB computer picks, NBA computer picks, NFL computer picks, NHL computer picks, NCAAF computer picks, and NCAAB computer picks.
Leans.AI (leans.ai) has 43 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 4.2 out of 5.
Website
leans.ai
Category
Colleges & Universities
Location
Boulder, Colorado
Listed on Five Star Index
2026
About these reviews
Replies
The company replied to 33% of reviews.
Latest
Most recent review: September 2026.
Edits
Reviews are shown as their authors wrote them. The company can reply, but cannot edit them.
Score
This company cannot pay to remove reviews or change its score.
Here is a very indepth review of Leans.ai, I have been a paid subscriber for 4-5 months on executive, 4-5 months on intel, and a free member for longer. I track all picks, every day. They lose money across the board on all models, the only model that was profitable long term ironically was the free picks model. Intel was horrible, they dont even track it on their site, massive red flag, they show they have the capability to, they track everything else, but wont for intel, ask yourself why, because they know it loses. Executive loses, so you may ask why does their data show it wins? Their data is highly inaccurate. They know what the best odds are for each pick they put out, but they use a blanket statement of "We use an average of -110 odds" Which if their average was -110, ok thats fine, issue is, its not, its worse, which drastically changes all their data. They share half truth data because their system isnt actually profitable so they must scew it. All their social medias are dead, another red flag, and their support is non existent, no replies to any emails for anything. Its a dead service, with no marketing, no known customer base, no actual verifyable legitimate track record just fake statistics, and no customer support, it hits all red flags
RO
Roy
Misleading Results and Selective Reporting — My Experience With Leans.ai
**Misleading Results and Selective Reporting — My Experience With Leans.ai**
I am extremely disappointed with Leans.ai and Steve Westfeld. Based on my personal experience tracking the free picks posted on the website since the beginning of this year, I believe the results presented to customers are highly misleading.
I created an account specifically to view and track every free pick. What I observed was a troubling pattern: when a free pick won, it would often appear on the statistics page and contribute to the advertised record. However, many of the losing free picks I documented did not appear in the posted results.
This gives potential customers an incomplete and, in my opinion, artificially positive impression of the service’s performance. A legitimate handicapping service should publish every official pick—wins and losses—with the original odds, date and time clearly recorded. Customers should not have to independently track selections to determine whether the advertised statistics are accurate.
I lost a significant amount of money following these picks because I believed the posted performance record represented the complete history. Had all the losing selections been included, I would never have placed the same level of trust in this service.
Another major concern is that many of the baseball picks I tracked were favourites, frequently priced between approximately -140 and -180. Despite laying substantial juice, the results were still extremely poor. In my experience, the service struggled to produce even two consecutive winning selections, while the losing picks seemed far less likely to be reflected in the public statistics.
The final straw was the San Francisco Giants selection against the Los Angeles Angels. While that game was unfolding poorly, I reviewed my records and realised how frequently the results I had personally tracked differed from the impression created by the website’s published statistics.
I strongly recommend that anyone considering Leans.ai independently document every pick before placing a wager. Take screenshots showing the selection, odds, posting time and final result. Do not rely solely on the statistics displayed by the website.
Based on what I personally tracked, I do not consider the advertised record to be a fair or transparent representation of the free picks that were actually posted. I am finished using this service and believe potential customers deserve to know about my experience before spending money or risking funds based on these selections.
I invite Leans.ai and Steve Westfeld to publicly provide a complete, timestamped and independently verifiable record of every free pick posted this year—including every winner and every loser.
AS
Adam S.
These people won’t stop spamming me…
These people won’t stop spamming me everyday. I’ve unsubscribed and emailed my request. No response. About to take legal action.
CW
Camille W.
Spamming me with emails
I have emailed them several times & have hit unsubscribe just as many times but they are STILL spamming me with emails daily! I also haven’t received any replies to my emails to support requesting that they remove me. Extremely unprofessional.
Response from Leans.AIJan 23, 2026
Hi Camille,
We are having an issue with our third party email service provider where they appear to be dropping unsubscribes. Our deepest apologies! Please email [email protected] with your email address and we can ensure you're removed from the mailing list.
DA
Daniel
Sub fee is way to high, the value is poor, Questionable practices
I want to start off by saying this is a honest review after using Leans for over one month. I was actually given two months free, but the results forced me to stop using there recommendations.
I do sports betting as a side hustle and with AI changing the landscape of sports betting, I wanted to try out a couple subscription sites.
So let’s jump right in. I want to mention again that is my own personal experience. I will highlight the pro’s and cons. Before starting, I do want to also mention that they do state Remi is a long term bot, but what constitutes long term in sports betting, a month, six months, a year? I suspect they just have a weak algorithm and use that talking point as an excuse.
Pros:
1. Probably the easiest interface to use, sign up and each day you get 1-7 bets a day in your email with each bet depending on the number of sports playing.
2. They are fully transparent with how there AI bot named Remi is doing as they update the results daily on their public facing website.
3. After putting an unsatisfactory review on Trust Pilot, they did reach out and give me two months free.
This is where the pros end unfortunately.
Cons:
1. The price vs value is extremely off. Currently as of today they are down over 25 units for NFL/NCAAF. The price is $299 a month. This is one of the most expensive AI driven sites I’ve seen and used. Most sites are around $99 a month with better predictions or even free.
2. The public facing website shows 5 stars on Trust Pilot which obviously is not true, some will take this as deception on their part = Red Flag
3. One major Red Flag is absolutely no chat or discord feature. I suspect this is because it keeps the costs down low and doesn’t allow subscribers to openly complain about how poorly Remi is doing during a certain time period.
4. To get any type of help, you have to email them. It says 24hrs, but I was experiencing a response after multiple days or none at all.
5. When you get your “recommendation” on the bottom is states, “This data is not a recommendation as to whether or how anyone should wager.” $299 is a lot of money for a recommendation that they warn you not to use? especially when there are recommendations for free. The hands down worse aspect of all is this is located directly on there site where it states “Remi is a computer sports prediction algorithm that uses AI for calculating the highest probability sports picks.” This is another Major Red Flag, this is a common bait and switch practice.
6. When you get your recommendations, multiple times I have seen them labeled wrong, an example would be it’s an MLB but it’s labeled NFL. This pretty much erodes the confidence of the recommendation, the QC of leans comes into question as well.
7. Out of the three sites I was testing they were in dead last @ -8 units, which has grown to over -25 units. In comparison, the two others are @ +11 units and @ +93 units and Leans is triple the price with zero features or tools.
Unfortunately, as you can see it did not go well. I did pull my initial review down to give it another shot, but the experience just worsened.
I have been keeping daily records because I am a firm believer in being honest. I will be posting a video on YouTube with my documentation and supporting evidence directly from the Sportsbook for full transparency. I am guessing they will reply to this trying to discredit my experience, but the numbers and screenshots don’t lie.
I hope people read my experience and learn from it, look out for the red flags.
Full transparency - I used 1%=1 unit with a 10k bankroll during my experience.
This is in response to leans reply just like I said they would. I get trying to tear mine up, just like you basically do with others.
Pretty sure we are on the same page seeing that you are, wow even worse than when I left, -22 units in CFB and -13 units in NFL lol.
You are still posting a fraudulent trust pilot score !
I never got one email with any sort of props or was told this was an option! Maybe if you answered an email I would have known?
The red flags are all there. You can call it a story, but just three facts I stated are literally on your webpage as of 8/23/2024.
I’m sorry that this review frustrates you, if it was my business that was apparently struggling, I would write a reply trying to deflect the blame on me as you are.
I appreciate the two books you suggested. Here’s a great read for you, Winning with Data: Code a Football Betting Algorithm. This might help your negative units for over the last couple months.
Response from Leans.AISep 23, 2024
Hi there! Thanks for the review! While we may not be on the same page (or even the same book) with most of your points, we totally respect your right to an opinion. It does make us wonder why you conveniently ignored our 65% win rate on football player props this year - but hey, why let facts get in the way of a good story?
As for Trustpilot, they’re serious about weeding out the fakes, so no worries there. We’ll just have to up our game and remind our thousands of happy customers to speak up a little more so the 0.005% don’t get all the spotlight.
We genuinely hope you find the service that works for you. In the meantime, maybe check out some books by Wayne Winston or Billy Walters if you want to dive deeper into statistics and probabilities — it could help your understanding a lot in the field of predictive analytics!
Take care and all the best!
Remi’s Handlers
SG
Sean G.
Mediocre at best…. Worth 30/mo not $300.
Bullspit… they give percentages but never any odds at which to take the bet. Like “take at -120” etc.
Their service is catered to the casual bettor that doesn’t care if they win or lose. These aren’t professionals.
Also, to ask for $300/month is a disgrace for the level of service. Their win percentage is mediocre at best, as well.
—- edit as if their last response.
Bragging about 114 “units” in a year is a joke. Remi declares a unit as 1% of bankroll. Any bettor knows that a unit is generally referred to as 3-5% of bankroll. So after a full year they’re up 30 units?
They’re an absolute waste. Many other cheaper insight tools and discords at a fraction of the price
Working for a competitor? No. I’m an Average man that Thinks it’s absolutely gross to ask for $300/month with only a 100 “unit” return.
Unless your average bet is $500+ per bet, the $300/month ask is disgusting. 100 unit profit on $100/bet is only $10,000 for the year, minus $3000 in remi fees.
Lastly when you don’t list odds and recommend a -200 favorite, it’s inaccurate to call it a “unit win”. By that logic your statement of +114 unit profit is misleading and fraudulent.
These guys are a joke
Lastly, yes… I used a free trial and lost a few hundreds off your crap insights. Then went on Whop and found actual sharps to jump on and win my money back.
Response from Leans.AIJan 11, 2024
Hi Sean - We're bummed you had a poor experience with Remi!
Remi was up +111.4 net units (after vigorish) in 2023 and we have hundreds of happy, long-term clients who think Remi is far better than mediocre. Remi's units are calculated using a flat -110 vigorish on every pick. Since Remi picks over/under and against the spread, and since underdog picks aren't advantaged at all in the calculation - the net units metric was within a 0.43% tolerance for average sportsbooks lines on the games in 2023.
Remi never recommends a -200 favorite, or a -150 favorite, but only picks against the spread, over/under, (with the occasional slight favorite or slight underdog moneyline pick). Implying Remi picks -200 odds is a false statement and shows your clear misunderstanding of the service and the metrics.
As any experienced sports bettor knows, predicting sports can be streaky and we see your account was opened for only 14 days. Please note, Remi was designed based on long-term statistical trends, so trying to evaluate Remi over such a short window of time is an inaccurate characterization of how the algorithm was designed. We offered you a free extension of your trial because of this fact, but you declined.
Your first point is absolutely correct, we don't recommend whether or how to use Remi's data in your own strategies. Our Terms of Service and every email with new picks states “This data is not a recommendation as to whether or how anyone should wager”. We don't advise people at which odds to bet, and any implication otherwise is a misunderstanding of the data we offer.
It is interesting to note - you’re reviewing us negatively for not providing which odds to bet, but we clearly state we don’t provide this type of data. You say we aren’t professionals, but any professional knows that sports analytics is very streaky and a 14-day observation window will provide little insight into how good or bad any model is. And all this over a free trial that cost you nothing to evaluate. Rarely does someone write a bad review over something that is completely free, unless they have an agenda.
If you were a year in and had spent thousands of dollars, you might have more legitimacy - but if you were a year in, you’d also be up +111.4 units like the rest of our satisfied clients. These facts raise some real questions about the motives behind your review, and we wouldn’t be surprised if you’re working for a competitor.
Regardless, we sincerely appreciate you trying out Remi and wish you the best of luck finding another service.
-Cheers!