N. M.
The digital age equivalent of physical abuse
You know how a few decades ago teachers were allowed to hit their students with wooden paddles if they got a question wrong? IXL does that to you mentally. One experience I recall is getting to the “Challenge Zone” which is where you have 90 or more points, called “SmartScore.” You only get 2 “SmartScore” per question answered correctly, but when you answer incorrectly, anywhere from 20 to 50 “SmartScore” get removed. The difference between IXL and a teacher beating their students (other than the lack of physical contact) is that the questions are often completely nonsensical. One particular lesson on IXL which was assigned to the class had something in the question along the lines of “What are the values of [variable x] and [variable y]?” But, the question had one answer box. If you put the wrong (but still correct) answer in the box, it would then explain to you why that answer was wrong in the wall of text that appears after getting something wrong. Apparently, we were supposed to “infer from the question” which value we were supposed to put into the box. The question that asked us for both values. Another IXL lesson’s answers just felt completely made up. We’d select the one that made the most sense, but it would just say it was wrong. By the end of class, very few had a “SmartScore” above 30. But that’s not all. Some lessons are just complete blow-overs. One lesson could take one or more hours, but the next could take 30 seconds. Needless to say, IXL is a complete mess, especially when it’s completely mandatory in almost every class. It either is completely ineffective by means of having nothing-burger questions, or, on the other side of the spectrum, completely ineffective by means of having the worst-designed questions known to man. Please, for the sake of students’ sanity, refrain from using this depraved application ever.



