In The Money StocksReviews of inthemoneystocks.com

His reviews are so BAD he has changed the Company name & I have no idea why Kitco & David Lin & Daniel Cambone who have good guest keep having him on for interviews I followed 10 of his trades & 8 out of 10 lost money them I followed another 20 & 17 lot money He does non top Youtube Videos to hype us his New Company name to suck in new people ho do not check his reviews I have been in Business for 30 + year & do not have 1 negative review on my company He is now called Verified Investing & after he gets enough BAD reviews he will change it again I ill nor even listen to his advise for FREE A complete SCAM ARTIST 100%

Used this service when I first started trading. He will continue to add to losing trades and then stop talking about them when they continue to go against him. No risk to reward ratio. No risk management. You will lose if you trade with this group. Please save your capital.

Do not do it. The idea that you can short alone is dangerous and you will lose.

This machine is spam. Avoid them. I did not received any payout from them. I have used other company as profuple and i never lodge any complain to their market structure or payout infrastructure

AVOID them Huge loss for 1 year membership with them. I was 1 year with them in day trading room and end up with loosing half of my entire saving that I gathered for 10 years. Gareth is not honest, it suppose to be a day trading but leave some trading for months and those made me huge losses, this is againts what they call it day trade. Even in day trade gareth start with 1/10 psition and then price goes against the trade and the money you put in the trade is getting heavy and heavy and in the event of loss which happend a lot you will end up with huge loss, and the wins are most likely in your 1/10 or 2/10 positions, which made it light wins and very heavy losses. Based on 1 year my experience, AVOID AVOID AVOID them.

Scums bags they told me it no risk and took me. The only opportunity I had was the lawyer of & ŘEFUNDBACK, fixed it for me to have all bak

This service is completely misleading and dishonest. Here is a simple analysis, you will see 80%-90% "win rate" which is a pointless metric without knowing the total return. Then you see "Portfolio Return" and it says "Based on a conservative average portfolio allocation of 4% per swing trade." Now ask yourself, if the profits outweigh the losses, would they really use a conservative average? No, they would show the real data because it's so great. They have every single metric. What this is doing is hiding the massive losses which Gareth holds for multiple years to avoid lowering the "win rate". Do the Open positions show current Profit/Loss? Of course not, you need to calculate each one manually to understand how massive the losses are. Next, if you check Closed positions you'll be amazed that the position size is not displayed. They've successfully hidden any reasonable measure of long-term profitability to confuse and mislead people with their "win rate". I watched the "master trader" short tech stocks in a raging bull market for 2 years while holding losers beyond -300% because "they will correct eventually". This is the most reckless, non-disciplined trading strategy. The worst part is watching Gareth in his videos contradict what he's doing in the portfolio.

Have been a subscriber for the service for ~3 years. It started well, the first year was even profitable (worse than index investing though) but the rest of it was a disaster. The traders running the service are holding onto massive losses on shorts for years (they give recommended stop targets, but never follow them themselves as they say in videos for subscribers): NVDA (down 250%), SMCI (down 56%), GE (down 92%), MSFT, AAPL. These positions are down so much and are so overweight in the portfolio, that any further trades in 2024 will not recover their portfolio to 0% loss, even if markets correct 50% like these traders expect. The best they can do is limit the losses when and if the markets correct, but they will still be double digit losses percentage-wise for the overall portfolio a subscriber of this service would hold. That is, if the traders running this subscription service didn't get margin called, which they should have been (as mentioned in one subscriber video from beginning of 2024, they were close). You can do so much better :). Even a bank deposit is better than this service. And SP500 index investing is massively outperforming this active trading "methodology" in the last 2 years. Service subscribers are never shown total portfolio P&L that would be formed if they followed the trade signals. Which is the most basic metric of whether you should bother with this service. One of the traders running the service started doing that in IBKR account in a couple of subscriber videos and then pulled the plug on the idea. If I had to guess why, they probably figured revealing the overall portfolio performance YoY (it should be about minus 50% or more) would scare subscribers away. Only two things are shared (instead of overall portfolio performance): their entry points (average price, short/long, and the time the position was opened), and "portfolio' percentage" of the position. But there are so many tricks buried into portfolio percentages, you will never figure out their overall portfolio P&L mathematically. I will share just one of the many things they do so you can never figure out the overall P&L. Let's say you want to throw in 100K to test the methodology offered (beware that they can go up to 2-3x of the initial 100% allocation, but let's forget that nitpick). Say, they claim they are long T, for 10% of the portfolio (10K) at average price X. And then the next day T's price goes down 50%. That position is now 5% of the portfolio money-wise, they would say, but the overall portfolio actually shrunk. That also means overall portfolio is down 5% (this information is not shared). Consider multiplying this simple example 50 times for 50 open positions like this one, and then you can understand that the overall portfolio performance becomes impossible to deduct from the partial information the service is exposing to subscribers. You know what's even funnier? A few years ago they simply added the gain they had on closed trades (and only closed trades, not accounting for massive losing trades that are still open) to form a crazy number like +1756% and that was declared as yearly performance :). For example, they would close 3 tiny 1% of portfolio positions for 10% gain and in that case they'd declare +30% as an overall result. Current situation is no more transparent and no more accurate than the above. They also feed you other bits of partial information that is true (like 5 last successful 1% portfolio trades they made 10% on) but they never share the full picture (like their overall portfolio across all positions in aggregate being down 50%) which is what you need to know when considering whether to follow this methodology. Note that I meticulously copied all the trade signals given by the service so the numbers above aren't random. The above is not my opinion, it's the overall portfolio P&L (2023--2024) which is the information you will never come across being a subscriber of Verified Investing/Smart Money: Stocks and ETFs. Best of luck with investing and learning how to do that somewhere else.