Under Competitor Attack⚠️ Warning to readersWe have strong reasons to believe that our company is currently under a coordinated competitor attack. Multiple fake profiles are posting misleading one-star reviews that do not reflect real user experiences.At the same time, we have observed that genuine five-star reviews from verified users are being removed, creating a distorted and unfair representation of our platform.We encourage everyone to approach reviews with critical thinking and to verify information directly. Transparency is at the core of what we build, and our community is fully open.If you are serious about understanding how we are changing the prop firm industry, we invite you to join our Discord and speak directly with real traders.
Under Competitor Attack (fundedhive.com) has 128 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 3.7 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing
Education Services · Washington, District of Columbia
Excellent
Education Services · Colorado Springs, Colorado
Excellent
Education Services · Harrisburg, North Carolina
Excellent
Education Services · Rockville, Maryland
Excellent
128 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Awase A.
The fact that fundedhive has everything covered on Blockchain allows even scalping type of strategies, doesn't have a payout day everyday is a payout day and even runs a pay after you pass program that you can even pay from profits generated from the live account after you pass the challenge following all complete criterias is just insane. No cap fundedhive is the best
Fx T.
The best with their instant payout
Saravanan L.
Fake prop firm. Do not buy any account from this stupid firm. They are cheating in the name of real A book firm. I own youtube channel and blog plus i am member of the 30 trading community. I have been working with 30 prop firm out of this. This company is not even worth of 1 rating. If any issue happens in your account even if you give solid proof they won't accept it. They don't activate your account. I got mail stating that I reached daily drawdown of 1500$. Then i checked the Ctrader,But Ctrader shows only 480.92$ then I given all proof with full report. They denied they said no no no Ctrader is wrong only my website is correct. Every trader will place order in Ctrader then it will go to propfirm website. If Ctrader is right propfirm website is right. If Ctrader is wrong propfirm is wrong. No one has brain in the firm or they are totally scammer. If you pass the challenge they will fail you with different reason. If you really want A book firm you can try Bull rush no rules with that firm. Only rule is do not reach daily drawdown you can use any EA except arbitage EA.
Mark
traded with FundedHive for around two weeks and my main issue is the way their A-book / B-book system works in practice. The biggest problem is that even if you are still well within the stated daily drawdown limits, a temporary floating loss can move you to B-book status. Then, to get back to A-book, you are forced to close trades and generate additional profit again just to return to the same position you were already in before. This creates a very unfair cycle: one losing trade can move you to B-book, profits made while there may not properly count toward payout expectations, and then another small loss can reset the whole process again. In reality, it feels like traders must produce multiple consecutive winning trades just to become payout-eligible, even when their overall risk remains controlled. The issue is not simply losing trades, losses are part of trading. The issue is that the internal routing/risk system indirectly forces different trade management decisions and can make weeks of disciplined trading meaningless. The advertised drawdown limits suggest one thing, but the actual operational model feels very different once you experience it live.I hope the 3 consecutive losses at A Book were with real money and that they actually lost it. Very disappointing experience overall and feels like scammy. I suggest to stay away.
oladipo D.
They are using traders to their advantage. The program is to enslave traders where they win 100% while traders are enslave and they have nothing to show. I didn't know on time about A book B book I mean it doesn't make sense. I did 4 pay to profit challenge but the moment I knew about A book B book I left everything. Yes is good they provide real capital but only allowed to risk 1% is terrible at least 3% will be manageable. Ment funding still provide 100 real capital, 1 step challenge with 6% static maximum drawdown this is live changing compare to this fraud hive. All the negative review are real not an an attack from a competitor. Their program is designed to enslave traders. If you want to trade real fund and be sure of payout go for ment funding that have been around for 4 years now with zero payout denial. Funded hive can improve and still be a game changer but let them at least offer 3% A book trade not the useless 1%.
Creative ideas M.
The company is not suitable for trading. They have terrible slippage. You will not be able to manage the account risks. You place a stop loss at 1%. You find yourself losing 2%. You place a pending order at a price that opens very far. You find yourself trading in a psychological war. You either leave the account or lose it. I tried more than one account with them. The same problem. I trade with a broker and with a financing company. Everything good goes into place except for them. Support. When you talk to them, they say buy a new account and we will clean the money for you. This is nonsense. I laughed. I laughed. I lost my last account with them today due to slippage. The deal was closed as they wanted. I do not recommend it. It seems unreliable. When you inquire, they tell you that they execute orders according to the market, and you are in the challenge phase. The account is a demo account, at the very least. Everyone who loses the account will be compensated, or from the beginning, they will tell everyone that they will not bear responsibility. In response to you now. This is a response to you. Now you appear to be a failed company. Yesterday, I raised my problem in the Discord community. I did not receive any clear answer, and now you are lying to me. Quite frankly, I bought several accounts and have friends. If we wanted to offend you, we would have just raised the problem since you attributed incorrect things to me. Why are they targeting you on any basis? If you were really honest and fixed the problem, return each person’s account and now no. No matter what, I thought your answer would be respectable, and now every time I will comment on you, I advise people before entering to stay away, because your slippage is terrible, a failed company.
Response from Under Competitor AttackApr 16, 2026
Your comment is full of lies. As we even have guaranteed stop-loss as we introduced it. We are the only company on the planet Earth who gives you zero slippage on your accounts. Stop lying and go back to your boss or the competitor company who gave you the order to leave the negative review. Have a good life.
Victoria M.
The A/B book rules make it impossible. You will constantly be in ‘debt’ if you hit 1 percent loss and get switched to B book.
Response from Under Competitor AttackApr 14, 2026
Dear Victoria, The A/B book structure does not make success impossible. It makes real funding sustainable. There is a very important difference. Most firms avoid this problem by using hidden restrictions, payout denials, trailing drawdowns, consistency traps, or by building a model that only works until too many traders become profitable. We chose the opposite path. At FundedHive, we back real performance with a real capital model. That means we also need real risk architecture behind it. If an account falls into the protected zone and switches, that is not some trick to block traders. It is the mechanism that protects the real funding environment and allows us to continue doing what almost nobody else can do consistently, which is paying traders without denial games. Calling it “debt” is also an oversimplification. The logic is straightforward: if real capital has already taken a hit, the system requires recovery before that account is treated again as being above water in the real funded environment. That is not unfair. That is exactly how a serious real-capital model must work if it wants to survive long term and keep payouts real. And the results speak for themselves. Even though FundedHive is only around one year old, we are already paying out more to traders than many much bigger and older firms with this model. You can see this publicly on Payout Junction: https://payoutjunction.com/firm/fundedhive . On top of that, all FundedHive payouts can be independently verified on-chain, which is a level of transparency that the average A/B book firm simply does not provide. The truth is very simple. If we wanted an easier-looking model for marketing, we could have done what many others did in this industry. We did not. We built a model that is harder to misunderstand, but far more sustainable, transparent, and honest. That is why FundedHive has never denied a payout, and that is why every payout is verifiable on-chain. AADS is not the reason traders fail. It is the reason the ecosystem can keep paying those who perform. Thomas CEO
Dani
I am a consistently profitable, funded day trader with a strict, mathematically tested risk management model. I am leaving this 1-star review not because I failed a challenge, but because of FundedHive’s deceptive support, lack of accountability, and a completely rigged A/B-Book system designed to steal a trader's edge. Here are the cold facts: 1. False Information from Official Support: I explicitly asked their support (Ryan) on Discord how their B-Book profit calculation works. I received a written, definitive explanation. Relying on this official information, I adjusted my risk management accordingly. 2. The Trap: When I took a normal, statistically expected loss, the system calculated the B-Book mechanics completely differently than what their support had stated. This resulted in an immediate, realized -$100 penalty that would have NEVER happened if they hadn't provided false information in the first place. 3. Zero Accountability: When I opened a ticket, provided the screenshots of their own support agent misleading me, and requested a fair compensation for the loss caused by THEIR error, they refused. They treated me like I was the one who didn't understand the rules, completely ignoring the written proof of their staff's incompetence. The reality? Their A-Book/B-Book model is not a risk management tool; it is a structural trap designed to punish your losses immediately while nullifying your winning trades (claiming them as "debt recovery"). If you have a real mathematical edge and trade with precision, stay far away from FundedHive. Your biggest enemy here isn't the market, it's their administrative paywalls and deceptive support. Reply: Dear Thomas, Thank you for the detailed response. To be clear, I am not calling FundedHive a scam, nor am I saying the system is rigged. In fact, I actually really like your overall model and the positive aspects of the firm. However, the core issue remains the A/B-book transition mechanic. The fundamental problem is that 1% continuously goes down the drain every time there is a switch to the B-book. If B-book profits were calculated starting from 99%, the system would be flawless. But as it stands, this mechanic mathematically strips away the trader’s edge. Despite all the other great features of your firm, this specific rule slowly bleeds traders dry, and this was exactly the root of my misunderstanding as well. If you were to adjust this mechanic, trading with your firm would be completely sustainable long-term. Right now, it puts traders at a massive disadvantage. Furthermore, I must note that I still haven't received the compensation that was previously discussed. I stand by my review because I didn't state anything false regarding my actual experience. My intention is to provide constructive feedback, but this mathematical disadvantage is a real, critical issue for traders.
Response from Under Competitor AttackApr 14, 2026
Dear Dani, This review tries to frame a rule misunderstanding and a support dispute as if FundedHive were running a deceptive system. That is simply false. First, FundedHive does not operate a hidden or improvised model. Our entire system is rule-based, automated, and applied in real time. The A/B-book structure is not designed to take away a trader’s edge. It exists because we run a real-capital model, and real-capital models require real risk architecture. Without that, firms end up doing what much of this industry does: payout denials, hidden restrictions, trailing drawdowns, consistency traps, and discretionary excuses. We chose the exact opposite. Second, the claim that traders are somehow left without information is also inaccurate. The information is available throughout our ecosystem. It is explained in our Terms and Conditions, in the Frequently Asked Questions on the website, across our Discord servers, through our support system, on the website itself, and directly on the landing page. So the idea that these mechanics are hidden is simply not correct. If a support agent explained a mechanic unclearly in one conversation, that is a communication issue that can be reviewed. But that is not evidence that the model itself is deceptive. It is completely unfair to jump from one disputed explanation to calling the entire system rigged, especially when the system itself executes automatically and consistently for everyone. Third, describing the model as something that “punishes losses immediately while nullifying wins” is a misleading way to talk about recovery logic in a real-funded environment. When real capital takes a hit, recovery must happen before the account is effectively back above water. That is not a trap. That is the only honest and sustainable way to run a real-market-backed model while continuing to pay traders long term. And the results are public. FundedHive has never denied a payout. All payouts are verifiable on-chain. Even though we are only around one year old, we are already paying out more to traders than many much larger and older firms. That is publicly visible here: https://payoutjunction.com/firm/fundedhive So no, the issue here is not deception. The issue is either misunderstanding, frustration, or dissatisfaction with an answer received from support. Those are very different things. Thomas CEO