EndNoteReviews of endnote.com

Costumer service is excellent, software is running smoothly and it is user-friendly.

I felt the new Endnote version was a good product that didn't differ significantly in my use so far. I'm interested to see what it can do as I explore more.

still some glitches with search function and the fact that have to switch back to personal library from pubmed search to actually be able to cite

I have been using Endnote for many many years now but just now bought my own subscription. I never faced as many problems with Endnote in the past as I di with this new version. It crashed on me few times and also gave me some trouble for which I had to go online and find solution. Additonally, with this version as well as the last, I always have trouble importing references from a pubmed-created file. I know how to work it now...BUT it is still frustrating !!

I am a long-term Endnote user, since at least 1985. Over the years the software has gotten increasingly complex and powerful. Sometimes reaching past the understanding of this author. However, I have never sought to change to another approach. When this onerous job needs to be accomplished Endnote is up to the task, even when it requires multiple discussions with the software providers.

The connection and ease with referring between endnote and word document. However, it will be great to connect to other Microsoft product such as power points. Also, it will be great if endnote can create subgroup based on reference used in specific document!

The new UI is good-looking. However, I hope that I can hide some fields on the literature information page. For example, if I do not need a tertiary author for a journal paper, I hope I can hide this field on the interface where I input the information for the paper. I remember I could do this in older versions by deleting the name of this field in the preference interface.

Good, but the interface could be improved.