CSU Global (Colorado State University Global)Reviews of csuglobal.edu

I have greatly enjoyed my classes at CSU Global. The content has been extensive and challenging. Professors have had varied styles of teaching with some going well beyond to convey greater expectations for their classes, which I enjoyed and agreed with. In some cases, the volume of material was a bit exhaustive, but that only forced me to go beyond my comfort zone, which more students need to do, and is reflected in discussion posts, where a variety of students seem less prepared than others. Regardless, the curriculum is making a defined impact in my career.

My experience was wonderful, because everyone was willing to help me succeed.

I was able to work on my timeline and have the assignments completed on time.

You may as well teach yourself

Good School, classes are easy to understand and navigate. The school has quite a lot of relevant degree programs for jobs that are actually in demand this day and age (which is great because some schools offer degrees that are useless, this school does not.) The reason it's 4 stars instead of 5 is because I wish the school was more active in the career services department. As in providing more opportunities for EVERY student to get in touch with jobs or internships so they are successful and have experience once they graduate. This might be a recession issue as there were more job related opportunities/programs back in 2023, but not as much now. I just feel that more universities should focus on their career services because it's cutthroat in the job market nowadays.

Everyone is super responsive and seems to really want to help. No one ever made me feel like a bother or like I shouldn’t be pursuing my degree. The website and layout is also great. A lot of sites can kind of get muddled and confusing even for tech people like myself. This experience was just very smooth and easy and enjoyable to be honest

I think the content needs to be updated and reviewed. There were many times were the module did not have the most recent information or the formatting was not done completely. It was good in terms of giving base-level information, but could definitely use some help with more in-depth information. It felt like a good baseline, but that's not what a Masters program should be. I think there should either be more pseudo-code to build off of, or more/better examples available to the student. The discussion posts also should be reevaluated. Asking an objective question, expecting varying answers, and diverse responses is just not feasible. I think more real-world examples would also be incredibly beneficial to help solidify the content being given.

The professors are good