CognitiveMetricsReviews of cognitivemetrics.com

Good tests and support is also quick and reliable

Cognitive metrics = tuff tuah

CognitiveMetrics offers something genuinely rare in the online cognitive testing landscape: a battery that takes psychometric rigor seriously. The CORE in particular is impressively thoughtful in design, with subtests spanning all major CHC domains and proper attention to g-loading and reliability. The dashboard is clean, the score reporting is transparent (composite g-loading, SLODR, confidence intervals), and the methodology is documented openly enough that an interested user can actually understand what they're looking at. What stood out most for me, though, was the support. As a non-native English speaker with a documented visual condition (keratoconus), I had specific concerns about which subtests were validly measuring my abilities versus capturing construct-irrelevant variance. The team responded very patiently to my multiple requests, accommodated methodologically reasonable adjustments to my dashboard, and engaged seriously with the underlying psychometric questions. That kind of responsiveness and support is unusual. Really an excellent work, simply.

CORE is the best test out there.

By far these are the best made tests I've seen online so far. My score on the CORE and AGCT tests were comparable not only to each other but more importantly to a test proctored to me in person by a psychologist. The only thing is that it'd be nice if we could see our past attempts to compare across time.

They are scammy and misleading. they say they will charge $10 for a full profile, classic bait and switch other websites use as well. Charge first and do test later, so as not to have people lose their time and your resources. And also grow some backbone and make the needed changes and be upfront instead of placing the same cookie cutter response (same you will undoubtedly use for my review) every time someone points out how much of a bait and switch your website is.

I took the CORE. I scored a little lower than I did on similar tests 35 years ago, but hey, I'm old now, probably accurate. The Share button was invisible on Chrome but not on Firefox, so just a momentary annoyance. I appreciate the resource and will likely hit all the free tests and maybe some paid ones; the freemium model is great as long as pricing is mentioned before taking the test; after would be deceptive and unkind, I think.

Baja precisión, pruebas sesgadas. Conozco varios casos de gente evaluada profesional, incluido yo, en los que se obtiene sistemáticamente alrededor de 25 puntos menos de CI. Queda mucho que mejorar en las normas. Aún así, muy visual y agradable el formato.