CNBCReviews of cnbc.com

Sadly, CNBC is no different than any other left leaning media. Let's say President Trump finds the cure for cancer. CNBC (& friends) would then report that President Trump is trying to bankrupt America through pharmaceutical profit loss.. What happened to the days when you could turn on the news and the anchor gives the report without an angle, spin, or his/her personal opinion. A time where a news report was presented in a way that the audience made up their own mind on how it affects them. I do miss those days a lot. Full disclosure, I feel the same way about Fox and other right leaning media as well. Mainstream media should stop reporting opinion pieces and just report the news.

Jim starting to hold information back unless you subscribe to their streaming service. What the point of watching this crap. Garbage to start 2025 - I've switched to Bloomberg & cheddar news

PLEASE GIVE US FINANCIAL NEWS AND STOP OVER COVERING POLITICS!

Can someone stop Andrew Sorkin from talking most of the time, what he thinks? This pinhead is talking too much these days. He won't even be on TV if his last name was not Sorkin. He is making it difficult to watch Squawk Box.

How is Andrew Sorkin still on CNBC? He is emotional, eradicate, and is clearly someone you would trust when it comes to money. This guy is emotionally unstable. I would consider him a liability to CNBC. Ratings have clearly reflected this.

For the past three years, I've started my mornings with CNBC's Squawk Box, drawn in by what seemed like unbiased reporting on investment-related news. Unfortunately, I've become increasingly troubled by the show's political shift in recent months. It now feels more like a three-hour political infomercial for a 37-time convicted felon, who was once deemed unfit for the presidency by the very anchor who now actively campaigns for him for 3 hours, every morning, on your show. Squawk Box has become nothing more than a 3 hour political ad for a former president now 37 time convicted felon. I've noticed a distinct rightward bias in the news coverage, with selective reporting that appears aimed at swaying viewers in favor of this candidate. As a registered Democrat in the process of becoming an unaffiliated voter in North Carolina, I strive to evaluate all candidates fairly before making my voting decisions. In my view, the Republican candidate for president is unfit for office because in my view he committed acts that I believe amount to treason against the Constitution he vowed to protect and defend, particularly with what I perceive as an attempted coup on January 6, 2021. As Lindsey Graham himself stated after order had been regained at the Capitol on January 6th....I asked them to show me 10 examples of voter fraud in the 2020 election, and they couldn't show me one. It is deeply concerning that one of your anchors would trivialize the January 6th insurrection by suggesting that the former president's belief he had won the election somehow justifies the actions taken that day. To put this into perspective, if Al Gore had believed he won the 2000 election and incited a mob to storm the Capitol, causing damage and endangering lives, would that have been considered acceptable simply because he thought he was justified? This reasoning is simply unacceptable. We are all entitled to our opinions, and I have no issue with who your anchors support politically. However, I do have a problem with your show becoming a three-hour infomercial for the Republican Party, with conservative anchors pushing their agenda on your viewers and actively campaining for the 37 time convicted felon running for president, for 3 hours, every morning on your show. I see enough political campaign ads all day long.... so I'm done with Squawk Box.

They are a fake news platform. Their journalists are far left radicals. And the news the report is either lies or half truths based on biases. The American people no longer trust them to tell the truth. They need to go.

I am heavily invested in markets. My interest and focus is in global markets and trends. My one star rating has little to do with the format and delivery of CNBC programming. There is one significant caveat to mu assessment: Joe Kernan is an utter turn off and interferes with the primary message expected by CNBC viewers because of his political messaging. Specifically, Kernan never misses an opportunity to signal his support for Trump. That messaging has filtered into the selection of guests for Squawk on the Street. JD Vance, for example, has been a guest on that show two weeks in a row with no opposing views presented. Kernan is a political hack with a demeanor that is sour, and negative. He should be removed from this platform.