Clarity TradersReviews of claritytraders.com

I've been stuck in processing(payout) for over a month. Stay away from this firm.

"I have had a terrible experience with Clarity Traders. They closed my funded account twice! The first time was due to a technical error on their own platform that caused an unfair drawdown. But the second time was even worse: I purchased a new account, and they closed it immediately before I even placed a single trade! ​Now, when I try to log in, it says 'Account does not exist.' This is completely unacceptable and feels like a scam. I have all the evidence, screenshots, and logs to prove that I didn't even start trading on the second account. Their support is unhelpful and they are just taking people's money. Stay away from this company if you value your capital!"

Charged without warning or verification very scammy

Scam site that don’t payout!! Requested $19k payout since Oct. 2025 and was denied stating high frequency trading even after I showed the a video proving my trading. You all are terrible and I will be filing a claim against your company!! Close down your whole operation and stop scamming traders please!!

UPDATE [Jan 27, 2026]: Formal criminal and civil reports have been filed. FBI IC3 Submission ID: 9ab06841f5294e77a91a9f4295681c02 FTC Reference #: 197001487 On October 2nd 2025, I had requested my payout of $23k while being first on the leaderboard with 25% profit gain, at this time my account was an accelerated 100k stating that there is no consistency in the trials and funded phase. I've been with Clarity for years with multiple payouts with this same account type. On October 13th Clarity enacted retroactive consistency rules to all accounts which they claim is viable under their T&C. I specifically got a written exemption from support stating that my current payout request from October 2nd "Will not be affected by the change." Well after 71 days of me waiting, they withheld 22,763.99 in earned profits for the exact rules they exempt me from in our own email thread. I find it quite interesting that all around Early October many people are complaining about the same exact scenario but all slightly different reasons? Luckily for me, they cannot claim simulated funds as they've paid me under accelerated rules many times before that I have proof of, I'm even on their social media as a payout receiver. As soon as someone posts a legitimate 1* review explaining this, this thread then gets filled with random, anonymous basic reviews from an account with no pic or prior reviews? The principal of this firm, Anthony Alvarenga, is currently attempting to dissolve ties to this entity to evade these liabilities while transitioning operations to a successor firm, Legacy Funded Futures. Unfortunately for them everyone, since I've had issues with them before I started screen recording absolutely everything from my written exemption to even Mamba pedaling this abomination on Instagram. I have given them every opportunity to settle this privately even after my subsequent fraudulent withholding of funds. Even with my generosity they replied with more lies stating my account always had consistency rules and proceeded to reply with laughing emoji's to the struggles I had been presented with due to relying on their "good faith" which they have none of. I have many pictures of my account never having these rules before October 13th even for traditional ones as well. For anyone affected like Marc, I and many others, I recommend filing a case with the CFPB, FTC and creating and IC3. I have done this actively to combat their bad faith and bring them to justice, they will not get away with their insolence. I can guarantee you, they will refute all of this in the reply below but if you were truly affected by them, please file with the FTC. Even IF they have started paying people again after this massive fraudulent shift to save themselves, they will not get away with hurting these innocent people. Also Mamba, one last thing when you read this; "Matthew 7:21"

I already wrote one review but deleted it as requested. They reached out to me and gave me a new free live account after denying me a $20,000 payout due to claiming I used EAs. This first incident was payout I requested on October 16th only to get denied in January. I gave them the benefit of the doubt and removed it until I got to the point of a payout with the new $500,000 account the gave me to replace that one. I wasn’t happy about it but figured even though I did all the trades manual atleast I’d let the account pay for itself. I was very particular this time around in how I would trade and even recorded entering positions to show they were manual only to meet the same excuse to not pay. I will be reporting them to the SEC and seeking legal action.

I’m writing this review to clarify my experience regarding rule changes and trading conditions. I purchased an Accelerated account in June 2025. At the time of purchase, this specific account type did not include a consistency rule (while other account types did), which was an important factor in my decision to buy and trade this account. According to support, a consistency rule was introduced in October 2025. However, this change was not clearly communicated or highlighted, and I continued trading in good faith while following all visible risk parameters. It took me a long time to pass the account because I traded slowly and conservatively, and during this period the firm also changed or migrated servers multiple times, which caused trading interruptions and required waiting weeks for updates before I could continue trading. In January 2026, when I requested my first payout, I was informed that my account did not meet the consistency rule. This was the first time the rule became practically relevant to me. Additionally, the platform enforces a minimum lot size of 0.1 across all instruments, with no option to trade or partially close smaller sizes such as 0.01. While this applies to all markets, it is particularly restrictive on instruments like NASDAQ and US30, where a 0.1 lot size represents relatively high exposure for a $5,000 Accelerated account. This limits proper scaling and risk management and can unintentionally contribute to uneven daily profit distribution. My feedback is not about avoiding rules, but about clear communication, transparency, and practical trading conditions, especially when rules or constraints are introduced after an account has already been purchased and traded under different assumptions. The platform itself functions well, but clearer communication around rule changes, server transitions, and position-sizing limitations would significantly improve trader trust and the overall experience.

Scam scam SCAM ALERT!!! MORE THAN 3 WEEKS WAITING FOR MY PAYOUT AND EVRYTIME I ASK THEY SAY " WE ARE RESIVING TO MANY PAYOUT REQUEST THIS WILL TAKE MORE THAN EXPECTED " SCAM SCAM SCAM DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY....... Y FOLLOW MAMBA SINCE 2022 BUT IS NOT LEGIT .