CanCan
Try Anyone Else
Uninformed, terrible takes and a bad track record of brigading.
Celebitchy is a celebrity gossip blog full of pictures of your favorite and not so favorite celebrities
celebitchy (celebitchy.com) has 214 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 1.2 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing214 approved reviews, newest moderated first
CanCan
Uninformed, terrible takes and a bad track record of brigading.
Blu
The site's mantra is that the Royal Family "coulda had a bad b****" which is offensive, and is just another example of how unprofessional and clueless the posters are.
Gail B.
Kaiser didn't bother to cover Beyonce's Disney deal, someone she has stanned for hard in the past. They all believe their favorite should have gotten it, so they'll even throw Bey under the bus. These people are completely ridiculous, doxxing people who post stuff about Megsy. The poster Aria went after Sasha Exeter's mother, a Black woman, in the aftermath of the Mulroney business, because they wanted to protect their favorite. She and the one calling herself notasugarhere are completely disgusting.
han N.
I was banned by Kaiser for pointing out a verifiable incorrect statement while commentators attacking me over it were never reprimanded . Most likely because they agreed with the wrong statement . Celebitchy or better Kaiser will not allow any comment that goes against the groupthink . This conduct created a toxic echo chamber .
Erin S.
Full of false information
Melinda T.
Horrible site. Filled with bullies. The "articles" are filled with misinformation due to Kaiser's prejudice and hate filled rhetoric. I'm amazed it hasn't been shut down. Hateful people and incredibly immature behavior that not only goes unchecked but is actually encouraged. Give it a hard pass.
Bunny
I can only echo the above. I found this site after googl’ing “celebitchy Markle biased” because I was just curious what the agenda was. I still don’t know the “why” but it is validating to see that others have noticed this too. I was banned twice. First, for pointing out that they were calling Meghan both a strategic genius who shows up PREPARED with a long game in mind, and saying she was so innocent and was completely caught of guard by finding out she was marrying Harry. They weren’t giving her credit for being an adult with a functioning brain. I was standing up for her. They just want her to be a victim. The second time I was basically the same thing. Like. “I’m sure she has hired good legal representation and trusts their counsel.” Not allowed. I also got deleted for saying that staying in Tyler Perry’s house where they were in full view of passers by and accessible to paparazzi was not in line with the blog about escaping the media in America. Meghan has to be pitied as a brainless, hapless, damsel in distress victim. I find it potentially sexist and racist...I can’t speak to their agenda. Why do they care what the content of comments are if they are kind and sensible? They constantly malign the Daily Mail and link click through a there. Long story short, they are oddly and extremely Meg obsessed, but very restricted to allowing anyone to talk about her as a real person who can goodly the royal family or hire a decent lawyer. Make a post congratulating her for being a lobotomized victim of Will and Kate (no Harry, he’s also lobotomized), cry about her being a victim, or get deleted/banned.
joandollie D.
I used to follow the website for years and it was just a fun gossipy place. I recognised many of the commentators and people would disagree but there was respect for differing views. It changed in the last few years. Huge focus on the British Royals. The comments are repetitious. If you are looking for a site to check out cancel culture- voila.