AxiosReviews of axios.com

Very disappointed I have been following this “news” source. I will not read another thing posted by them. I can not believe they would report a blatant lie concerning the Gulf of Mexico. The USA has no business change the name. As an American I am embarrassed and saddened to see media bend to the will of a person to be in their good graces. Stand up for what is right. Associated Press is where I will be going to get my news.

They reported it's not difficult to get into the country through open borders meanwhile millions of ILLEGALS!!!! are running across it into the US daily! Unchallenged, unobstructed, and unchecked completely. A disgusting notion.

Very politically biased. Political click bait at best. I wonder if these journalist are proud to cash their checks knowing full well they are the exact reason why so many people have a hard time, trusting anything in the news anymore. Believe it or not a lot of us just would like to know the actual facts, and then draw our own conclusions about a situation. Believe it or not.

Always a slant in their articles. News type headlines contain mostly editorial positions. The best description would be lukewarm propaganda.

Almost worthless. Filled with sponsor advertising which they claim does not impact editorial. Corrupt. Have you ever seen an article critical of Goldman? Also, redundant -instead of reading One Big Thing - Read NYT, CNN or Fox daily emails. They have 2,000 + reporters all over the world. This is garbage. Total waste of time.

Axios is a “news site” that is primarily an aggregator based on the peculiar views of its very few top founders and editors. The bounce rate is a sky high 74.5%. The Alexa ranking in May, 2020 was 5,724. Not too many readers or followers here. Those that open it quickly decide it is not for them and leave. Today, for example, after the tear gassing peaceful protesters in front of the White House, Axios ran a story on its cover about the business of tear gas. On this solemn day, business? really? An odd selection indeed. The editors seem to be in the business of editing to protect their advertisers. Not too many articles criticizing major advertisers such as Morgan Stanley. It is clear these guys are here for a financial score. Not journalism. The slant is hidden but pretty clear. It bleeds a little red. The only major journalist who breaks stories and has a following seems to be Jonathan Swan, a well known carrier of Trump’s intentional “leaks”. Where are the other major writers? The world is currently filled with daily news summaries from organizations large and small. With their narrow approach, the site will always be limited, and have a high bounce rate. When you open it who knows what you will get. But their budget might balance. As a reader, you are better off just going to broader news site where you find your stories of interest each day.