Hi everyone, I want to share an important update:
On the same day that I deposited USDT, I also imported it into Quantum Wallet. Later, I noticed that my funds had been transferred out without me making any withdrawal, and they were sent to an unknown address.
Right now, it’s unclear how this happened or where the funds were transferred.
So please:
🔍 Check all your wallet deposits and transactions on ChainScan / BscScan.
If any of you notice similar unauthorized activity,
please collect your reports and send them together to ChainScan support so the issue can be investigated properly.
Your asset security is important — please double-check your transactions.
GT
Gayan T.
Till August 2025 end given withdrawal…
Till August 2025 end given withdrawal now not giving withdrawal. Now a scam
DE
Desert
### Warning About QuantumMax Wallet…
### Warning About QuantumMax Wallet (ATU Network)
I want to share my experience with **QuantumMax Wallet** to inform others about potential risks.
1. **Private Keys May Be Controlled by the Platform**
* From my use of the app, it appears that **QuantumMax has access to users’ private keys** on their servers.
* This means it is **not a true self-custody wallet**, and the platform could theoretically access or freeze your funds.
2. **No Public Staking Site for ATU**
* All ATU token staking is done **within the QuantumMax app**.
* There is **no independent or external staking site**, suggesting the platform has full control over the staking process.
3. **No Verified Security Certificates or Audits**
* I could not find any **third-party security audits** or publicly verifiable certifications for the WALLET or the ATU Network.
* Any claims of encryption or integrations appear unsupported by verifiable evidence.
4. **Warnings from Platform Staff**
* I was informed by a Telegram admin that my wallet is under **SEC investigation**.
* While this could be social engineering, it demonstrates **lack of transparency and potential for manipulation**.
5. **Implications for Users**
* You do **not fully control your assets** in this wallet.
* Storing large amounts of crypto here carries **high risk**.
* Consider moving funds to a **trusted self-custody wallet** where **you control the private keys**, such as Trust Wallet, MetaMask, or Ledger.
**Conclusion:**
QuantumMax Wallet may **appear convenient**, but the lack of independent audits, control over private keys, and transparency issues make it **high-risk** for holding or staking crypto.
You're absolutely right to question the details—it's essential to verify such important claims. Based on current, independently verifiable information, here’s what we know:
----------------------- Question :
## Did QuantumMax Wallet (ATU Network) pass a CertiK audit?
### What CertiK’s Skynet Dashboard Shows
* The **CertiK Skynet project insight page** confirms that **“Quantum Wallet”** (linked to ATU, atu.network) completed **one audit** with CertiK. The audit was **requested on August 1, 2025** and **completed on August 5, 2025**.([CertiK Skynet][1])
* The Skynet report indicates:
* A **code security score** of **88.80**
* No critical, major, or medium issues—only one **informational finding** marked as acknowledged([CertiK Skynet][1])
* The dashboard also labels the project with a **"CertiK Audit" badge**, suggesting it indeed passed a code-level audit([CertiK Skynet][1]).
### Official Project Claims
* The **Quantum Network’s X (formerly Twitter)** account states clearly: **“Quantum Wallet successfully passed a comprehensive audit by CertiK on August 5, 2025.”**([X (formerly Twitter)][2])
## Summary: Is the CertiK Audit Real?
**Yes** — Based on publicly available data from CertiK and statements by Quantum Network, Quantum Wallet (ATU Network) appears to have undergone and **successfully passed** a CertiK smart contract audit, completed on **August 5, 2025.**
## Important Caveats to Keep in Mind
* **Scope of the Audit**: CertiK audits typically focus on **smart contract code**, not necessarily on wallet infrastructure (backend servers, API security, app behavior). The audit refers to the **ERC-20 token contract (“ERC20FixedSupply.sol”)**, not the wallet’s full architecture.([CertiK Skynet][1])
* **Missing Features**: The dashboard shows **no team verification**, **no bug bounty program**, and limited operational maturity or transparency.([CertiK Skynet][1]) This suggests limited oversight or proactive external security engagement.
* **User Risks Remain**: Even with a contract audit, if your concern revolves around **control of private keys**, **centralization**, or **lack of transparency**, those are **external to what a smart contract audit covers**.
## What You Can Do Next
1. **Review the full audit report and findings** on CertiK’s Skynet platform yourself for more context.
2. **Evaluate the wallet's architecture**—e.g., server setup, how private keys are handled—to assess whether it's truly self-custodial.
3. **Seek independent analysis or user reviews** to verify the real-world behavior vs. claims.
4. Consider moving funds to a well-known, audited self-custody wallet where you control your keys if you're concerned about trust or transparency.
CU
customer
QUANTUM WALLET que detém o token ATU e SATU Parece ser duvidosa
Parece ser duvidosa, Pediu que se faça um depósito na carteira para liberar fundos ganhos por meio de Air drop. Pelo que sabemos os Air drops são livres. Não é necessário fazer depósitos para os fundos serem liberados.
No seu site há muita coisa que não bate certo em matéria de criptomoedas, como dizer "online e offline" em vez de se usar o sufixo "chain" (onchain).
Não há clareza quanto às operações em blockchain não há especificações, detalhes sobre nada. Muito conteúdo com apologista à promessas.
Algo de forte suspeita é a alta recompensa no Air drop do seu token Satu. Os videos sobre a empresa no seu canal do YouTube parecem encenados, dá para notar claramente que o comentário de algumas
pessoas não são reais e muitos deles até são repetitivos, passam uma mensagem garantir credibilidade forçadamente por meio de engajamento de pessoas interessadas e felizes com o projecto, pela existência de muitos e bons comentários a cerca do mesmo.
O redirecionamento para baixar o aplicativo a partir do site não é verdadeiro, para se ter noção o redirecionamento para a Play Store não chega a ir para o site oficial da Google, ma instala o app de forma directa.
Enfim, tudo indica ilegitimidade desta empresa.