ArcReviews of arc.dev

We schedule a first stage interview. reschedule... I did not mind. I reschedule the second stage interview due to technical difficulties. All good. I sent emails asking for the content and methodology of the technical interview. No answers. The day of the technical interview I was asked to code a simple Fibonacci function in my preferred coding language. After working and studying the whole day I could not finish it. I have 14 years of experience as a software engineer ,but having a gap (time) in my resume. I asked where to send my certificates and translated degrees. And my communication skills were also questioned... worked 4 years in Customer Service in Australia including high risk environments and IT development. now they reply: " We appreciate the time you’ve invested in the vetting process. Unfortunately, you did not pass. We are looking for candidates who have: -A complete application -Significant work experience -Effective communication skills -Proficient technical skills" not happy at all with the process. "we are so sorry, but because you could not finish this wall, we can not believe you are an architect" very basic and 1 way communication also... My technical interviewer has the worst English pronunciation ever

Maybe it's just them using the stupid automated skill set list, that CV library extracts, but my CV is something else. With decades of experience I am appalled by agencies that cannot even be bothered to send an email. It's been 2 weeks, and the position is still listed, is this just another CV scraping exercise? Who can tell with service like this.

It has been more than 2 weeks, and my profile review still hasn't been verified. It's a waste of time for a developer, so I just deleted my account.

Keiana Russo is one of the rudest people I have ever dealt with in my life. This company should be ashamed to employ a person like this. I've never been treated so poorly.

I am a senior software engineer with 8 years of experience. Recently I decided to challenge freelance and signed up on major platforms. I came across this site as well and applied. After several days it requested video introduction and they refused me in saying I said plagiarized answers. The question was how would you explain internet. LOL How could they judge a person with a few questions? I contacted their support team and their answers were ridiculous as well. No wonder there were few number of projects on this platform. I recommend them introducing a more reasonable screening process rather than those dummy video screenings. Not meant for serious senior devs. Just a waste of time.

wasted a lot of time in this website and never got even an interview i think it is a scam

never head of this company in my life and they wont stop spamming me

Helps you waste your time without feedback) At first glance, the platform looks good and continuously changing/improving. But the verification process is something... strange. So, I spent time on the first verification steps and scheduled the introduction call. The zoom call (at 9 p.m. in my timezone) was with someone bored without video and any interest in the talk, and it smells like a chat on passport control in an airport at 5 a.m. just after the airport opens. The next day, without any emails or other notifications I found in my profile that I "didn't pass" without description of why and what I can improve. Also, there is a stuck notification in the notification center that can't be open. In another ~36 hours, I got an email with the same message and no feedback They allow you to retry the process in 6 months when you improve yourself but don't say what you should improve :) Update after a year and a half: Arc still says that I didn't pass and need to try again later :D Nice way to handle reviews.