Zackery P.
Most toxic community I've ever visited
Most toxic community I've ever visited. All people on this forum are crazy. STAY AWAY!
4chan is listed under Media & Information.
4chan (4chan.com) has 16 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 2.8 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing16 approved reviews, newest moderated first
Zackery P.
Most toxic community I've ever visited. All people on this forum are crazy. STAY AWAY!
Duten P.
the initial motto was to be anonymous. Over the years it kept getting more and more trashy users who just come for degenerate porn. And now it makes you jump through several hoops of dumb puzzles with time limits and long waiting times before you can even post. And if you do the captcha wrong, whatever you wrote in your post gets deleted. Irritating. It gives a nice message that you can avoid the irritating experience if you give them money. Or you can just avoid this website.
Kiwiii
Is bad as : Quora, Lemmy, Reddit (the worst), just same ugly person that not let anyone say if not what they agree on they are all trash sites (fake socials), and they are criminal socials
Anonymous
In my experience, ban pages almost never clearly identify the reason for a ban (or even a warning): It will tell you what rule you supposedly violated, but rarely (if ever) does it share the post in question. Prior to the relevant ban, I was warned for abusing the report system despite having reported posts that _actually_ violate the rules. Last week, I was banned in a /soc/ contact thread along with other innocent users as protected by /soc/ Rule 6. Supposedly, the entire thread was banned for calls to "raid" under Global Rule 4. In a conversation with a mod named yournamehere, a "raid" is when one user explicitly posts a third-party's contact info (forbidden as "doxxing" under Global Rule 4, except as allowed by i.e. /soc/ Rule 6). (It's believed that an attempt to provide an example given by yournamehere will fail due to the use of homophobic language.) The argument from yournamehere is that because the /soc/ contact thread existed to connect users seeking to roleplay a certain kink, there can be no way to distinguish roleplaying from actual Global Rule 4 violations. This problem exists in every /soc/ contact/meetup thread, regardless of whether a given thread is meant to connect people who wish to roleplay about anything via some third-party messaging app. When asked, younamehere was unable to provide an example of any explicit (read: actual) violations of Global Rule 4. Absent any actual violations, the blanket ban on all participating users is naturally improper (and if there were any actual violations, banning everyone in that thread isn't the answer). I tried my best to explain this problem in my appeal, but it appears that 4chan is no longer allowing anyone to post /soc/ contact/meetup threads. After all, if that one thread constitutes Global Rule 4 calls for raiding, then so does every other instance of people uploading contact info (in accordance with a given contact/meetup thread) because mods can't ever distinguish the legitimate publishing of contact info from third-party contact info being involuntarily posted. Rather than acknowledge and correct the abuse of power demonstrated in this blanket ban, my temporary ban became permanent, perhaps for the sole reason of daring to challenge improper moderation. This would explain why even my pre-ban Moderation Feedback has been ignored. Because 4chan can't be bothered to voluntarily to even amend the rules to reflect the mod(s') position in this matter, I can't imagine any other way to force 4chan to take its logic to its natural conclusion except for suing 4chan for declaratory and/or injunctive relief consistent with its decision in this matter (or preferably in accordance with its own rules at the time of the improper bans). I'd rather take this up with 4chan's service providers first, except I can't imagine how any of the misconduct shown in this matter would conceivably constitute a third-party TOS violation. Absent voluntary corrective against by 4chan and a third-party with the least amount of legal power (such as one of the aforementioned service providers), the only remaining remedy available would be to sue 4chan, which does not appear to be of any concern. Seeing as 4chan can't be bothered to followed its own rules (perhaps waiting until someone like me "steps out of line" to invoke its natural power to ban anyone for any reason), this does not surprise me in any way.
John D.
DO NOT BUY THE PASS!!! It often doesnt even work, and the mod team is EXTREMELY unprofessional. They WILL take your money and laugh about it
Ariel NOT A GIRL V.
our response xisters?
Ron E.
Used to be 5 stars but the moderators there are slowly emulating reddit moderators and the free speech it used to be a bastion of is suffering.
Silva
Very good. Internet should be diverse.