Screen RantReviews of screenrant.com

Screen rant ‘journalists’ are generally poor at their job and some of the takes are bizarre and just, well, dogpoo. Do not trust this site for genuinely interrogative and critically curious commentary.

Awful and highly annoying.

Garbage z tier access media website.

Click bait article titles, written by people that obviously have no idea what they are talking about. Read any article and it becomes apparent most of what the say is made up, for example "Starfield might save Xbox series X" or "Sony PS5 disaster gets worse" and "Nintendo Switch struggles to be relevant." None of these consoles are having problems, S/X and PS5 have been selling out for over a year now. The Switch is the highest selling console since the PS2. The site is a harbor for talentless opportunist "journalists".

Screen rant just posted an article where they lied about Amazon listening to "Fans" in relation to Rings Of Power... Amazon is most likely lying about this seeing as they lied about having used an Tolkien expert when they in fact fired said individual very early on because of his input. Screen Rant only posts click bait articles that in themselves only contain political rants and or even lies as their reporters don't actually do any investigative work beyond what they perceive as political.

Screenrant is trash, repetitive and just annoying. They don't have good writers. Reading their headlines only annoys me. Most of what they write is click bait and exaggerated.

Every ScreenRant headline I've clicked on — every single one — has turned out to be misleading or just a lie. "Devs Season 2: Release Date and Story Details" -click- "...we don't have either" "Why Link's Hair Is Pink In Zelda: A Link To The Past" -click- "...we have no idea" "Earth could look like Mars sooner than we think!" -click- "...in ten billion years" Bottom-of-the-barrel trash site.

They know nothing of what they write on