NewsGuard fights #misinformation with credibility ratings of news websites—written by trained journalists and displayed in your browser. https://t.co/BjIf0KFHho
NewsGuard (newsguardtech.com) has 74 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 1.2 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listing
Media & Information · Stanfordville, New York
Excellent
Media & Information · Rochester, New York
Excellent
Media & Information · New York, New York
Excellent
Media & Information · CtAlbany, New York
Excellent
Showing 69 reviews with 1 star · Clear filters
Steve R.
The teachers unions support this. The teachers unions are leftist, they would not support a tool such as this if it were centrist/neutral. CNN praises it. CNN is radically leftist, it would condemn Newsguard if it were centrist. Newsguard is a leftist tool, plain and simple.
rose garayua T.
Too left leaning no critical thinking. Just a leftist site.
Jim
Sadly a control arm of the alt left. They assess sites that are not news sites and are realistically unaccountable - you are a sham company. I rate you, untrustworthy.
Uwe O.
Linksextreme Seite die von zweifelhaften Geldgebern finanziert wird!
Lynn M.
Unbelievably BIASED. When cNn has a bigger score than fox something is amiss. Just another liberal attempt through MISINFORMATION to fool the masses.
Fraid K.
Newsguard is funded by Clinton donors and big pharma, with ties to the CFR, NewsGuard seems to have a clear agenda in favor of mainstream media. L. Gordon Crovitz is on a SOROS FUNDED Journalism Advisory Board. Steven Brill a former publisher of Wall Street Journal the definition of Political Fake News. Ignored Establishment Media for Border Patrol Whipping Hoax. Did they Ever Report the Russian Collusion Hoax from ALL MSM? Seems like no since Media constantly brings up those lies continually! Corruption is hard to avoid when you're owned by BIASED People.
Mary C.
"Newsguard" is a complete misnomer. IT decides what "news" you can get and IT doesn't guard anything except ITS own bias. It has done some ludicrous "guarding" such as preventing free speech and treating the public as half-way intelligent rather than deciding what we should read or believe. Just another high-tech censorship mechanism. When will the public wake up to this?
L R.
What a terrible idea for countering misinformation: pick an expert and go with what they think. No fact checking of your own. There is controversy in so many areas - just picking a person to listen to is like throwing a dart and. Things are seldom black and white and all companies like this do is get it wrong 50% of the time. And you're silencing people that have good counter positions - it's simply censorship. It takes a lot of arrogance to say that you can discern truth from fact in a complicated world, but that's what you say you do. We'd rather think for ourselves rather than believe your errors.