Gamingbible is listed under Media & Information.
Gamingbible (gamingbible.com) has 275 customer reviews on Five Star Index, with an average rating of 1.0 out of 5.
Is this your business?
Correct your details and reply to customers in public. Both are free.
Claim this listingShowing 273 reviews with 1 star · Clear filters
TheSovietAra
Honestly, if you want information from GamingBIBLE, you might as well open ChatGPT/Gemini and ask it instead. It's AI clickbait garbage with no credibility and a lot of ads. Asking a 5-year-old would be more helpful than using this awful site.
Brendan C.
Honestly I don't believe any of the "journalists" - and I use that word extremely loosely - are in fact gamers. It's all just clickbait articles with buzzwords, and close scrutiny of what they're saying when you actually know about the games they're talking about reveals a shocking lack of basic knowledge about the subject matter. Case in point: saying Delta Force is a new ghost recon-like game, when the 2 share no commonality other than "shoot guns". Delta force is a 64 multiplayer PvP a la Battlefield and COD, which ghost recon has never been.
Neko M.
Clickbait and AI Central. Belongs in the bin, not on your phone.
Andy M.
Deceitful click-bait. The article titlea are always about a DLC for a triple A title, then 4 paragraphs of useless drivel later they reveal that its just a mod made by some players. Whoever works on these articles has sold themselves out.
Pedro C.
I get spam from these subpar amateurs, the last one was about this amazing Easter egg in Fallout hacking that nobody discovered yet.. turns out it was like 10 paragraphs to explain the game's basic tutorial. Either they exploit illiterate children or maybe need to find another branch to go defile since gaming clearly isn't working out
George W.
clickbait shit. i wish i could block them from ever appearing in any of my news apps. i hate them and all their stupid articles
Rodney C.
Nothing but trash click bait articles. Content so poor that they need to lie about it to get clicks, pathetic. To call this a "media outlet" is a joke. Calling it an "offal conveyor belt" would be more appropriate
Lucas T.
If I were an atheist, calling it a bible would be apt. Best treated as purely entertainment rather than informative, even then you're not getting much. They do nothing more than take things from other outlets to repackage them into as many stories as they can, and generally have an irksome tinge or outright bias that makes things either annoying to read or pushes outright proven falsehoods months or years old.
