Game RantReviews of gamerant.com

Clickbait phishing garbage output

Dishonest reviews, stop glazing games that you want to do well but simply aren't doing well.

Horrible A.I. driven clickbait crap. Most of the ‘guides’ are not written by humans, leaving them soulless and comically bad. They seem to have a guide for every game and their obstacles, but try to stay clear of them, as you will just give them money by clicking on their Google ad-sense fueled top-links. So yeah, screw Game Rant.

The articles they write about manga and anime have the most wrong info EVER idk why but it pisses me off a good example is they're top 8 strongest humans in berserk. They put guts at 8 and Griffith at 4 if we're talking pre eclipse Griffith from when he was still human then we know that guts is far superior ever since fighting Zodd it's even stated in the manga what's worse is Guts stayed human so they're counting Guts that obtained powers far exceeding that of even Zodd maybe even all the apostles combined which is something that only a godhand is capable of Griffith (from when he was human) couldn't even kill a general in the last war they fought (the rino one) and he couldn't even hit a weakend apostle how in gods name would you scale (human) Griffith above Guts and an even worse take is Casca at nr 4 Casca the one that was roughly equal to an extremely weak general the one that couldn't defeat even one monster during the eclipse while guts (without the berserker suit and any other enhancments) was able to take out hundreds and yet they scale her above Guts? That just drives me insane I know I'm doing way 2 much right now but it feels like they're rage baiting me, for engagement. They put Fernese the Fernese that can't even use a knife to save her life LITTERALY when she was attacked by trolls she couldn't even swing her knife it's true that she learned magic but at her strongest she's a little weaker than Schierke WHEN WE FIRST MEET HER and that's at her highest scale which means she would maybe be able to best an orc compare that to the PROVEN feats guts has like being able to best an army of 100 men and a general (weakest version of guts) or being able to wield a cannon capable of shooting through an apostle that apostle was so strong that no bow sword or even trees of hundreds of meters tall thrown at it would do much and yet guts that has a built in cannon on the arm he lost was able to shoot a hole through that apostle without breaking a sweat (weak version of guts) or him having killed hundreds of monsters during the eclipse you could easily scale those monsters to 1/10 of an average apostle and he was able to kill hundreds while tired bleeding out with one weapon while searching for Casca while being totally surrounded and the crazy thing is he did all this in a relative weak version of himself (compared to where we are now in the story) all these feats are either when he was in a weak form or the weakest form we see him fight as that being when he was 12 even as an 8 year old he was able to wields swords of 50lbs that later became a sword of 300lbs when he was 16 (around that age) so if you see some f/cking bullshit opinion that doesn't make any sense written by game rant (or rather chatgpt cuz i have the feeling they use AI to write their articles) than it's not the character being weak or you not having any reading or watching comprehension it's them being wrong as fck

ai content articles, i don´t recommend this site, only put keywords in a trash text for search engine

These articles read as if they were spat out of Chat GPT and not even edited. I suppose that's why they are so erroneous. I understand that most online content sites are already doing that to cut costs. Obviously, no one here trusts anything posted on Game Rant. If they can provide proof that my suspicions are valid, I would really like to see it. Based on my own experience testing out AI (Windows makes it easy to try that out, btw) I can tell the difference between generated content and actual human writing. Also, I have a Masters degree in creative writing, so I prefer to avoid using such tools other than to see how janky the output is.

Attempted to use the site for GTAV info and it was mostly wrong. I kept noticing it across other games and had to come and see if they were truly as bad as they appear and it appears they are 🤣🤣

Gamerant, Screenrant and the like are just filled to the brim with heavily search engine optimized "articles" where keywords and filler paragraphs make finding the answer or kernel of useful information a real struggle, if it even exists. Don't be surprised if you land on their site looking for a specific answer, read the question you have in the title, the introduction and then trudge through hundreds if not thousands of words to only find out they don't even have the answer to the question in the first place. Pure and utter trash, I wish I could blacklist it so every single googling isn't muddled by these articles making finding anything of value that much harder to find.