AvvoReviews of avvo.com

Response to Avvo: It is funny how you were so quick to censor my review, as well, and you didn't even do a great job defending your severe policies about removing any and all negative reviews while ignoring positive ones even if they mention bigoted terms. You are pathetic and you can keep making laughable responses, showing how your company is really just thin-skinned lawyers defending other thin-skinned lawyers, but I mean if you want to, keep responding as if trolling my review will win people over. Keep complaining about my review as well. I know that the rep from avvo I had mentioned earlier is the one responding to this but too scared to use his name after using other's names in his responses. I encourage every reader to look at their vague community standards that only apply to negative reviews. If you are so welcoming of negative reviews as much as you are with positive ones, then you wouldn't do such a pathetic job of justifying the removal of negative reviews. When you ask avvo about how saying a lawyer was rude or abandoned the case, expect them to simply ignore your question or tell you that it magically goes against their guidelines about racist statements and personal attacks on their precious attorneys. Good luck. Avvo is probably the worst site when it comes to making reviews. They aggressively protect attorneys on there. Positive reviews are not scrutinized, negative reviews are judged based on grammar and for the negative ones, they demand exact details that the attorney was hired and about what happened, but they also don't allow many of those details in the reviews anyway. ****** ****** of Washington is responsible for rejecting your honest reviews of shady lawyers. Let him know how you feel about them suppressing anything that can hurt a lawyer's feelings.

I’m totally disgusted with the censorship at avvo.com in regards to an honest review of a Washington attorneys by the names of Robert Jensen and Rachel Loo at the law firm of Stewart MacNicholes Harmell. Thanks to your censorship this law firm will shortly have their own website with numerous question about sexism and discrimination against men. I’m thoroughly disgusted that Avvo would censor a review from a male victim of domestic abuse and violence and then falsely accused of a crime. This is discrimination based on gender. The reason men don’t report domestic abuse and violence is that they are usually blames for their own abuse. It’s one thing to be abused and assaulted by a woman and her daughter—people who have viewed/heard the recordings I made have stated that they are everything from Borderline, Narcissistic to just outright crazy—but it’s another far more dangerous and scary thing to have “institutionalized violence” against men. Apparently if you’ve been abused and falsely accused by females the lawyers with this law firm will do the prosecutor's work from suppressing video/audio defense evidence to refusing the assistance of an expert attorney on U.S. visa fraud. I had assistance from a domestic violence program, video/audio recordings, written records, lots of evidence yet this law firm told me it was "they say you say." Really? What was really scary about this law firm is that knowing I was a victim of abuse at the hands of females, switched attorneys to Rachel Loo who gave me an “ultimatum” to take a domestic violence class as though I was the aggressor. I guess they thought I would put up with more ultimatums—I mean I had lived with ultimatums, threats, abuse and violence for almost two years so maybe they thought I would put up with more of it. They were good for one thing and that was delaying things until I could put other things in place including: a unilateral protection order against my abusers, their family and the female 911 caller on the case who had an arrest record for assaulting none other that a man (it's true), a unilateral nullification of marriage as well as having all of these documents hand delivered by an attorney to federal authorities at USCIS along with the video/audio recordings. The names and state bar numbers of the attorneys as well supporting evidence were also reported since the motive involved was visa fraud. So good luck to the fraudsters on this one! We are trying to get her overseas property for damages but it looks like the locals will get it first. Apparently one of my abusers used a Zell account to funnel money overseas to avoid connection with her name. It's also know as using a "money mule." Nothing surprises me about these people. Fraudsters. I've seen it time and time again. They pass themselves off as little angels and then the videos and evidence comes to light to show what they really are. If you are a male victim of domestic violence and false allegations steer clear of Stewart MacNicholes Harmell. Just think, if the genders would have been switched what would this law firm have done? Ask a woman to attend a DV program or fight the false allegations?

Avvo runs a scammed system to deceive the public. Any lawyer who receives a negative review can dispute it, and it will be removed by Avvo. The lawyer does not have to tell Avvo any facts about what is being disputed. If a new review is written it will be denied as duplicative even if all the facts are different. So a lawyer can bury negative reviews with a single word "DISPUTE " and Avvo will assist. Then Avvo has the system "fixed" to reject subsequent negative reviews.

This company keeps sending unsolicited emails to my under age childs school account and it looks like message questions were posted as well, we are not even residents in the US and fall under European GDPR. For two weeks now I have emailed and even phoned this company to establish how they got the email, was an account set up and to confirm removal of same but their phone is always left unanswered and so are emails. I am now going to the European data protection commission. Totally unacceptable.

Your reviews are not anonymous. They will give the lawyer you reviewed your IP and email if they submit a subpoena. Do not use this site.

Please beware ! They wi always will go to the lawyer side . They have a conflict of interest What un honest and unprofessional company!! Stay away

When an adverse party is affected by acts of an opposing attorney which are clearly in violation of the rules of Professional Conduct, and said attorney has, in fact, provably committed multiple felonies in defense of their client, including, but not limited to: Attempt to Influence a Public Servant, Forgery, Wire Fraud, Conspiracy, Obstruction, etc. Avvo feels it is within their right, and/or policy guidelines to conceal, aid, and abet? I'm happy to use my sitebuilding and SEO optimization skills to inform as many people as possible that Avvo is untrustworthy, and will do so. Daniel T. Goodwin of The Law Offices of Daniel T. Goodwin 10901 W 120th Ave Ste 350, Broomfield, CO 80021 defended my former employers in a wage claim lawsuit I had filed seeking wages due upon termination of employment. Daniel T. Goodwin, as proven on the record of the Court, swore simultaneously before BOTH the Colorado Division of Labor, and the Weld County District Court, that NEITHER had jurisdiction over my wage claim, because the matter was before the other. i was stripped of my Due Process right, and all evidence to prosecute my claim, the case was dismissed, and the employers were awarded attorney's fees in excess of $20,000.00. tey immediately encumbered my home with numerous liens, garnished my wages, and the Weld County, CO DA had my home raided, and I was arrested when I refused to give my tax returns, and the deed to my home to my former employers. Avvo concealed it all. The full horrible 8 year story will be published at hartmannconspiracy dot com September 2021 when the website is reinitiated.

Warning people Avvo will discriminate you , They will not post reviews against lawyer corrupt and paying them , they invent ghee own policy this a conflict of interest! Don’t post anything with them all is not honest