Pablo
Profitable Traders Should Read This…
My experience with Alpha Trader has fundamentally changed my view of the company and its business model. Over approximately two months I generated around **$17,500 in profits**, complied with the program requirements to the best of my understanding, maintained the required Trader Score, and acted in good faith throughout. My payout was ultimately denied following what I believe was an avoidable misunderstanding. Before placing the disputed trade, Alpha Trader's own Economic Calendar classified the USD ISM Services PMI differently from Forex Factory. Because of that discrepancy, I sought clarification through the company's AI customer assistant before entering the position. During the review, Alpha Trader confirmed that historical calendar records were unavailable, the relevant AI customer support conversation that informed my decision was no longer accessible, and neither was considered during the investigation. As a result, the very evidence that could have verified my good-faith reliance on the company's own resources could not be reviewed. Furthermore, The alleged violation was not brought to my attention until approximately two weeks after the trade. By that time, the chat history available through my dashboard only retained around one week's worth of conversations. This incident was only the latest in a series of experiences that, in my opinion, point to a concerning pattern. During my time with the firm I observed: * The Terms & Conditions state that traders generating more than three times the fees paid are subject to monitoring. * My qualifying profit days were counted incorrectly on two occasions, delaying my objectives. * One trading day was counted as two for Trader Score purposes without increasing account profits, making it harder to remain below the required 20% threshold. * A position 'appeared' on a locked account while a payout was being processed. * The company's own economic calendar classified an event differently from widely used market calendars. * Historical calendar records and relevant chat history later became unavailable and were not considered during the review. * The alleged violation was only raised approximately two weeks later. By then, the relevant customer support chat history had disappeared from my dashboard, * Before what would have been my first significant payout, I was asked to record promotional/testimonial material for the company. . Viewed individually, each issue might have an explanation. Viewed together, they led me to believe that consistently profitable traders receive additional scrutiny and may encounter obstacles that less profitable traders never experience. This impression also appears inconsistent with the company's marketing, which emphasizes trader success. At the same time, the company heavily promotes purchasing multiple evaluation accounts, while providing ambiguous answers regarding whether successful traders are actually funded live. Based on my experience, I question whether the business model primarily depends on evaluation fees and trader attrition rather than long-term trader success. I cannot speak for every trader, but I can speak for my own experience. I invested significant time, effort, and money into this program and deeply regret doing so. I encourage anyone considering this firm to read the Terms & Conditions very carefully, document everything, keep independent records, and decide whether the risks are acceptable before committing their time and capital.